The creation of the Kazakh ASSR is the first steps in the formation of the integrity of the Republic

Abstract

The article analyzes the complex historical events of the 20s of the XX century associated with the annexation of Akmola and Semipalatinsk regions to collect Kazakh historical sites around the newly formed Kazakh ASSR. From the middle of the XVIII century, the tsarist government showed interest in the Kazakh land and began to actively pursue a policy of colonial seizure of Kazakh lands. In parallel with the annexation of the Kazakh lands, it gradually began to pursue a policy of settlement in the Akmola and Semipalatinsk regions. The settlement movement had been especially intense since the 80s of the XIX century when the indigenous Kazakh names in the north and east of the Kazakh land began to change into Russian. For example, historically, it would be fair for Omsk County to fully enter the Kazakh state, although, during the previous colonial policy of resettlement, the tsarist government contributed to an increase in the share of
Russians in the northern part of this region. The consequences of this policy of the tsaristgovernment led to the unification of the Kazakh lands around Kazakh autonomy in the 20s of the twentieth century. The SovietBolshevik government, taking as a basis the priority of the people living in the region when surveying the border, led to the transition to the Kazakh land only of the southern part of the Omsk land, which became a major historical triumph of the Kazakh intelligentsia, the result of many disagreements and disagreements between the Kazakh autonomy and the Siberian Revolutionary government. The Kazakh people proving their belonging to historical territories returned to themselves. In the article, the path to the removal of the Akmola and Semey regions from the composition of the Siberian Revolutionary Committee and transfer to the composition of the KazASSR is considered. At the same time, the works of Kazakh figures were revealed, which proved that the land belongs to Kazakhs in historical, economic, and political terms. Generalized and differentiated prerequisites for the formation of the unity of the Kazakh land, after comparison, the results of the discussion are presented.