Artificial Intelligence and the Philosophy of Labour: Challenges and Prospects

Authors

  • H.A. Shimshek
  • G.B. Kolegen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31489/2025hph4/302-308

Keywords:

artificial, intelligence, philosophy, labour, deontology, utilitarianism, algorithmic, fairness, explainability, responsibility, gap, human-in-the-loo, Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA), reskilling

Abstract

The article offers a philosophical-ethical account of how labour is being transformed in the era of artificialintelligence. Drawing on classical conceptions of labour (Aristotle, Karl Marx, Hannah Arendt) andcontemporary AI-ethics frameworks, it juxtaposes deontological constraints with utilitarian assessments ofoutcomes, thereby delineating the moral boundaries of permissible automation and the conditions of itslegitimacy. A three tier model is proposed: conceptual foundations agency, dignity, and procedural justice;applied effects of technological unemployment and occupational redesign, algorithmic unfairness and the“responsibility gap”, alongside opportunities to reduce routine, enhance safety, and promote inclusion;operational requirements across the AI lifecycle explainability and traceability, Algorithmic ImpactAssessment, the human-in-the-loop regime, post-market monitoring, as well as reskilling programmes andrecognition of micro-credentials. It is shown that “fair automation” is achievable only when deontological redlines (rights, dignity, non-discrimination) are institutionalised and outcomes are optimised within thesebounds. For the Kazakhstani context, a baseline governance package is proposed: transparent goal-setting,model and dataset “passports”, independent auditing, a right to human review of decisions, and infrastructurefor just labour transitions.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

PHILOSOPHY